So you would be against any form of re-allocation no matter how limited? Is that because Polish deleted, then restarted his account? Had he not done so, would you still be against any form of limited re-allocation? I understand the desire not to be penalized for having forethought and strategic thinking when assigning your skll points. Yet would it be so bad to give those who had to learn along the way a chance to tweak their stats (within reason) to accommodate new information on game play? Not everyone was an experienced app player before playing VC, some players learned the hard way, after emerging from the dead accounts, that their stats were woefully inadequate and should have been better assigned. This, along with other factors, leads to a drastic player drop off around level 300-500. Something Kano has already attempted to address by raising the protected level from 300 ro 500.